🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. Survive an important European final versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, laying waste to the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Regarding Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director , after being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not creating the product, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to fire him for using excessively that system. Hire the project manager and then bin them for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.